Legacy
Teaching Culture proponent hopes for government support
Wednesday, July 5, 2006 -- Craig Anderson
Seconds after finishing her grant proposal to the Ministry of Health
and Long Term Care, Denise Bedard looked at Kim Hennin, a long time
friend and supporter, and said “We’ve got it.”
The proposal, “Improving
Ontario’s Health Human Resources in Long Term Care
using a Legacy Teaching Culture,” is, replied Hennin, the
product of 27 years experience in the field and Bedard’s own
legacy.
And although she admits she will cross her fingers
as the proposal is considered by the MOHLTC (it is also expected
to be read by Minister George Smitherman) she is continuing to focus
on her administrator work and is turning her attention to a local
steering committee to address gaps in service for acute care patients
in the London region.
But the process of developing a research proposal
was a seminal learning moment, says Bedard, an administrator at
Meadow Park London. Key to the process was working with Dr. Al Salmoni,
a researcher in the School of Kinesiology at University of Western
Ontario (UWO).
“I’ll always remember this process,”
says Bedard, who began work on “Legacy Teaching Culture”
in October of 2005. Since then, the project, which aims at creating
a truly person-oriented methodology in long term care, has blossomed,
culminating this week with a formal proposal to the MOHLTC to pilot
the multi-phase project using nine London-area homes as test cases.
The proposal, authored by Salmoni, Bedard, with
assistance from Dr. Phillip Doyle, professor in the School of Communication
and Speech Disorders at UWO, first points positively to the prevailing
ethic of person-oriented care in LTC while also examining the difficulties
involved in implementing this type of care.
Education and methods aimed at improving quality
of life for residents, argues Bedard, is often undercut by harried
work schedules, staff turnover, and the lack of involvement of the
residents in shaping the process itself.
“Another limitation seems to be the top-down
change processes typically used. It has been assumed that educating
staff within a nursing home will ultimately “trickle”
down to the residents. Most often residents and their families have
been left out of the change process.”
The proposal’s outlines five objectives:
1) Develop a set of education modules that are
appropriate for staff and can contribute to a certification process.
2) Design education modules as inclusive, involving
both formal (LTC staff) and informal care givers
3) Develop a comprehensive tool to assess quality
of life for residents, using current tools
4) Identify roles of family members and residents
in developing a person-centred culture
5) Create flexible care models based on efficient
and effective partnerships between informal and formal caregivers
More to come --
|