|
Top 5 meetings with MPPs
went well, say administrators
Friday, April 30, 2004 - Sheri Fiegehen
Meetings with MPPs about the Top 5 Priorities campaign went very
well, according to representatives from two long-term care homes.
Last week, as the results of the Top 5 Priorities
campaign were released, people involved in the sector met with their
local MPPs to discuss what people want to see addressed in long-term
care.
“A couple of outspoken residents (Bette
Brocklebank and Olive Gray) went, along with our program assistant
(Ann Skelly), who is a ball of fire, too,” chuckles Sharon
Steele, administrator of Leisureworld O’Connor Court.
They met with MPP David Caplan at his office and
explained the need for more staff – which was identified in
the campaign as the number one priority.
“They told him that higher staff levels
are needed to give the right kind of care, and they asked him what
assurance would he give” that the matter would be resolved,
says Sharon.
MPP Caplan then reportedly replied he understood
their circumstances and would do what he can – including talking
to Minister of Health and Long-Term Care George Smitherman and possibly
inviting the trio to a legislature meeting.
“Then Bette said, ‘Good. I hope Mr.
McGuinty will be there so I can ask him how many baths a week he
has,’” says Ann with a laugh.
In the Sudbury area, four long-term care homes
sent more than 50 representatives to meet with their MPP, Rick Bartolucci.
They were Extendicare York, Extendicare Falconbridge, Finlandia
Hoivakoti Nursing Home, and the Elizabeth Centre.
“Each home brought members of their family
councils, administrators and some residents,” says Nancy Foreman,
administrator of Extendicare York. “We felt Rick was very
positive; he promised to take our message to Queen’s Park.”
At Extendicare York, there was great participation
in the campaign from families, staff and residents, says Nancy.
In fact, the family council members took the reigns of the campaign.
“Each member took a floor and went resident
to resident, asking for their top priorities. The residents felt
very good about it; they really felt their opinions were valued.”
“We’re hoping for good things to come
out of this,” adds Nancy.
|